Judge strikes down an Ohio law limiting kids’ use of social media as unconstitutional

By JULIE CARR SMYTH Associated Press COLUMBUS Ohio A federal judge permanently struck down an Ohio law on Thursday that would have required children and teens under to get parental consent to use social media apps U S District Court Judge Algenon Marbley s decision came in a lawsuit filed by NetChoice a agreement group representing TikTok Snapchat Meta and other major tech companies The organization s complaint argued that the law unconstitutionally impedes free speech and is overly broad and vague The state contends the law is needed to protect children from the harms of social media Marbley mentioned that the state s effort while laudable went too far Related Articles Social media and smart sleuthing lead to California burglary arrest Kids under will no longer be allowed to livestream on Instagram without parental consent Trump holds off on TikTok ban after he almost closed deal with ByteDance AP source says TikTok s new owner stands to inherit safety privacy lawsuits Trump to weigh proposals from Amazon Oracle and others for prospective TikTok deal sources say This court finds however that the Act as drafted fails to pass constitutional muster and is constitutionally infirm he wrote adding that even the governing body s the bulk noble entreaties to protect its citizenry must abide by the U S Constitution Bethany McCorkle a spokesperson for Republican Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost reported We re reviewing the decision and will determine the next policies The law was originally set to take effect Jan but Marbley placed an immediate hold on enforcing it that he later extended It is similar to ones enacted in other states including California Arkansas and Utah where NetChoice lawsuits have also succeeded in blocking such laws either permanently or temporarily The law seeks to require companies to get parental permission for social media and gaming apps and to provide their privacy guidelines so families know what content would be censored or moderated on their child s profile The Social Media Parental Notification Act was part of an billion state budget bill that Republican Gov Mike DeWine signed into law in July The administration pushed the measure as a way to protect children s mental wellness with then-Republican Lt Gov Jon Husted saying that social media was intentionally addictive and harmful to kids Marbley revealed the law resides at the intersection of two unquestionable rights the rights of children to a notable measure of freedom of speech and expression under the First Amendment and the rights of parents to direct the upbringing of their children free from unnecessary governmental intrusion But his opinion cited court precedent that such laws don t enforce parental authority over their children s speech they impose governmental authority over children subject to parental veto NetChoice praised Thursday s ruling The decision confirms that the First Amendment protects both websites right to disseminate content and Americans right to engage with protected speech online and policymakers must respect constitutional rights when legislating Chris Marchese NetChoice s director of litigation noted in a announcement